The policy change, announced last month, comes after four years of a test-optional policy first adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Earlier this year, the News found that students from low-income backgrounds were more likely to omit scores from their Yale applications under test-optional policies. Additionally, international students have long expressed difficulties accessing SAT and ACT test centers in their home countries. 

Yale’s Office of Undergraduate Admissions has maintained that test scores are only one part of a student’s application. They have also emphasized that scores can help contextualize other parts of Yale’s holistic review process, which considers students’ high school GPAs, recommendation letters and extracurriculars, among other factors — which, research suggests, may mean that test scores could prove more advantageous to low-income applicants than often thought.

Several students expressed generally positive reactions to the new test-flexible policy; however, they also expressed hopes that the University will double down on its commitment to inclusive messaging and to eliminating barriers to testing access.

“I’m really happy with this change and I think this should be the model that other Ivies follow,” said Annalie Diaz ’27, a QuestBridge match scholar who submitted her scores when applying to Yale. “They also should continue to push those explicit words, saying ‘we will take your score into context, we will be aware of the context of your school.’”

Reactions to and hopes for test-flexibility

In a statement posted on its website, the admissions office notes that test scores are considered in relation to others from an applicant’s high school.

“No exam can demonstrate every student’s college readiness or perfectly predict future performance,” the statement reads. “Tests can highlight an applicant’s areas of academic strength, reinforce high school grades, fill in gaps in a transcript stemming from extenuating circumstances, and — most importantly — identify students whose performance stands out in their high school context.”

For Diaz, the coupling of the new test-flexible policy with messaging that explicitly details how scores will be used and considered has alleviated many of the concerns she previously had about standardized testing.

Coming from an under-resourced high school, Diaz said that her score — which was below Yale’s average but well above her high school’s — was necessary in contextualizing other parts of her application.

Since announcing its test-flexible policy, the admissions office has expanded the range of scores published on its standardized testing page. Previously, Yale published scores from its 25th to 75th percentiles. Now, however, it lists the range of ACT and SAT scores from the 10th to 90th percentile.

Diaz said the decision to expand the published range is “great.”

“By extending the range of published scores of students at Yale, students can see that people from similar backgrounds with similar scores have submitted those scores and gotten into Yale,” she said. “They will be comforted by the knowledge that they don’t have to do as well as the students going to private prep schools, they just have to be able to stand out within their own context.”

But Christopher Vera, a senior at Wilbur Cross High School who was recently admitted to Yale’s class of 2028, looked less favorably upon the new policy. 

He said that standardized testing adds an extra stressor to high school seniors who are likely already stressed about college applications. Vera said that he does not think that expanding the types of accepted test scores — which now includes Advanced Placement, or AP, and International Baccalaureate, or IB, exams — will do much to alleviate this stress.

“Even though my school offers APs, I think that if this policy did affect me, I would still heavily prioritize the SAT,” Vera said. “Maybe I’d even prioritize it more than I did when Yale was test-optional. I feel like now that all students are required to submit scores, they will pay more attention to them. Now that scores are such a hot topic, I feel like I’d feel pressure to just get as many on my application as I could.”

Diaz holds the opposite view, and is hopeful that the expanded list of permissible tests will make it easier for students to obtain and submit scores.

She thinks that all acceptable test scores are useful in leveling the playing field between students from different socioeconomic backgrounds.

“For me, what made me see the [tests] as this great equalizer between all students is that this is the one point in the admissions office in which all students can have at least somewhat similar grounding,” she said. “So for example, with extracurriculars, someone’s wealthy parents can get them an internship. For essays, students can hire private writing tutors. But everyone is taking the same [tests].”

Going forward, Diaz added that she said she would like to see the admissions office promote free resources to help students study for the tests from which they will now be requiring scores.

Reactions from international students

Last month, a News survey found that domestic respondents were 12 percentage points more likely to have taken a standardized test before college when compared to international respondents.

In line with the survey results, several international students described difficulty accessing standardized testing centers in their home countries, adding that tests are more accessible for wealthy international students.

Tajrian Khan ’27, who is Bangladeshi, described extensive financial barriers to taking SAT and ACT tests in Bangladesh. Unlike domestic high schools, which frequently distribute fee waivers, Khan said it was difficult to get financial help paying for testing because few students from his school were applying to college in the United States.

Khan is from Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh. Every testing center in the country is located either in Dhaka or in Chittagong, the country’s second-largest city, he said. Students from anywhere but those two cities have to travel long distances and find overnight accommodations in order to take SAT or ACT tests, Khan said.

“The new policy doesn’t really do anything at all in the context of problems for international students,” Khan said. 

Jesse Okoche ’25, who is from Botswana and could not access a testing center when applying to Yale, shared similar concerns and called the new policy a “bummer.”

He said that his family has been scrambling to assemble the funds to send his little sister, who is currently applying to college, to Botswana’s only SAT testing center — five hours away from their home.

Adding APs and IBs to the list of accepted scores does little to alleviate international accessibility issues, Khan said. Even if a Bangladeshi student were able to access an AP or IB testing center, he said, they would have to self-study for the exam, putting them at a disadvantage to domestic students or students who are able to enroll in AP classes to prepare for the tests.

“No schools in Bangladesh offer AP classes,” Khan said. I know before this year, there were no AP testing centers in all of Bangladesh, so even if you wanted to take the test without a class, that wasn’t an option.”

Overall, though, Khan said he believes that test scores are an important measure and that he hopes to see Yale expand the list of acceptable scores in the future.

Okoche, however, was disappointed to see test scores become again required in any capacity, and agreed with Khan that the addition of AP and IB scores does little to improve international access.

Okoche said that, in addition to few SAT and ACT testing centers, IB curriculum is also rare in Botswana. He said there is only one private school in the capital city that offers IBs.

In the spring of 2023, a digital version of the SAT was offered internationally; the first digital version of the SAT will be administered in the United States later this month. Okoche said he is hopeful but not confident that a digitized SAT will improve international access.

“As an international student from a country that doesn’t send many students to Yale, I felt like, as one of the first to do something, I have this responsibility to open the door for the rest,” Okoche said. “And so this new policy is basically telling me that everything I’ve done has failed to open that door, failed to show Yale that [students who were unable to access tests] are capable, even though they don’t have that one metric Yale is looking for.”

But even though the new digital SAT and the new test-flexible policy don’t solve all of the access problems faced by international students, Okoche said he appreciates that the change is a “step in the right direction.”

Yale’s new policy makes it more accessible to low-income international students than policies recently adopted by other schools, Okoche said. As an example, he said that a student who could not apply to Dartmouth or MIT — two schools that recently reinstated a more stringent SAT or ACT score requirement — could perhaps still apply to Yale going forward.

“From all of this, my takeaway is hope,” Okoche said. “We’ve taken a step, and I’m hoping we can continue to take more steps.”

The first domestic digital administration of the SAT will take place on March 9.

The post Students share mixed reactions to Yale’s new ‘test-flexible’ policy appeared first on Yale Daily News.

All other testimonies — which came from students, student collectives, college groups, a non-profit and the Yale College Council — supported the bill. One organization, the Connecticut Conference of Independent Colleges, did not fully support or oppose the bill.

If passed, the bill –– SB 203 –– would prohibit public and private institutions in the state from “inquir[ing] about or consider[ing] a prospective student’s familial relationship to a graduate of such institution” when making admissions decisions.

Committee co-chair Sen. Derek Slap, who has championed the bill, said that he was encouraged by the hearing, which he called “part of a national movement” in state governments to reevaluate legacy admissions.

Slap said that the hearing was “by far the most robust conversation about admissions, legacy, privilege and opportunity in higher education” in which he has participated while part of the General Assembly. 

According to a study last year that drew on internal admissions data from several elite colleges, including Ivy League schools, legacy applicants are often “slightly more qualified yet are four times as likely” to be admitted to top schools.

Yale’s Dean of Undergraduate Admissions and Financial Aid, Jeremiah Quinlan, testified against the bill for more than an hour over Zoom. In his remarks, Quinlan said he does not believe the General Assembly has the right to interfere with the university admissions practices.

“Just as every Connecticut college or university teaches different classes in different ways in fulfillment of its educational mission, each institution should likewise be allowed to assemble a student body that promotes its educational goals,” Quinlan wrote in a statement that he read out at the hearing. “A university may make a voluntary decision to forgo consideration of legacy status in the application process, but a Connecticut state law dictating that decision for independent colleges and universities would be unprecedented and would invite future legislatures to impose their own views on who should be admitted in ways that threaten academic freedom.”

Quinlan further described progress that the University has made toward enrolling more first-generation and low-income students since he began his tenure as Yale College’s dean of admissions. He argued that banning legacy admissions would not be necessary or useful to the cause of recruiting diverse classes, given the work Yale has done to increase access.

Per his testimony, 22 percent of students in the Yale College class of 2027 are eligible for Pell Grants, 21 percent are first-generation college students and 59 percent are domestic students who identify as members of a minority racial or ethnic group. Over the past 10 years, he said, the number of Pell-eligible students has doubled, and the number of first-generation students has increased by more than 60 percent.

Instead of banning legacy admissions, Quinlan suggested tht the state prioritize initiatives that directly help promote access for first-generation and low-income students, such as increased support for recruitment and outreach programs. He specifically noted increased support toward enrichment programs for less-advantaged high school students and increased funding of the Roberta Willis Scholarship Program, which offers need-based grants to Connecticut students enrolled at any of the 18 participating public and non-profit private colleges in the state. 

State Rep. Gary Turco said that preference for applicants with legacy status creates an “uneven playing field” that he believes has contributed to a larger national trend of decreased trust in higher education. Citing nationwide declines in enrollment numbers, high student loan debt and admissions scandals, Turco said that the message the bill might send about fairness would be as important as any practical impact on the universities’ diversity.

Turco estimated that currently, around 40 or 50 legislators would be prepared to vote in favor of the bill, noting that most others have not yet made a decision and only a “handful” would likely vote against it, out of the total 151 legislators in the House. He hypothesized that those who would vote against the bill are likely to do so because they are concerned about overregulating private institutions, not necessarily because they are in favor of maintaining legacy preference in admissions.

Turco said that although he thinks the bill is likely to pass in committee, he suspects it will struggle in a broader vote in the legislature because “private universities hold a lot of weight in the state.”

Rep. Dominique Johnson said that while they support the idea of a bill banning legacy preference, they are not satisfied with the current bill and would like to see it also ban schools from considering the donor status of an applicant’s family. Johnson is also advocating for the bill to clarify whether it applies to graduate and professional schools as well as undergraduate schools.

Birikti Kahsai ’27, who is a senator representing Branford College in the Yale College Council, testified at the hearing on behalf of the YCC. She told the News that the YCC has begun to advocate against legacy admissions as part of a broad collaboration between several student governments of Ivy League universities that have been adopting a unified stance against legacy admissions.

“We emphasize that the archaic practice of granting advantages in the application process on the basis of familial ties is antithetical to Yale’s commitment to meritocratic admissions,” the YCC testimony states. “Those historically granted the opportunity to form such connections were overwhelmingly White, wealthy and Protestant, due to the inaccessibility of higher education.”

Kahsai stressed that the goal of the YCC in opposing and testifying against the bill is not to attack individual legacy students but rather to pressure the Yale administration about its use of legacy preference, which she said YCC views as “incompatible” with Yale’s other admissions policies.

The testimony from the YCC was undersigned by seven Yale cultural clubs as well as The Yale First-Generation and/or Low-Income Advocacy Movement.

Jim Zhou GRD ’24 also testified at the hearing. He explained that he relied on food stamps throughout his time at the University of California, Los Angeles, where he earned his undergraduate degree. He said that UCLA’s legacy-blind admissions approach has allowed the school to “excel with socioeconomic diversity” — and that Yale is lagging behind.

“I think that legacy admissions are perhaps one of the biggest barriers to achieving socio-economic diversity on campus because legacy applicants overwhelmingly come from backgrounds that have enormous amounts of privilege,” Zhou told the News.

New Haven civil rights attorney Alex Taubes LAW ’15 explained that the Connecticut legislature draws its authority to regulate private institutions, including universities, from an authority of state governments known as “police power.”

“This power allows the state to impose certain requirements on private institutions to ensure they contribute positively to the state’s goals for its education system and the overall well-being of its residents,” Taubes wrote in an email to the News. “When it comes to education, states have a particular interest in ensuring that institutions serve the public good, as education is closely linked to economic development, civic participation, and social equity.”

Taubes added that consumer protection law specifically could provide potential justification for a ban affecting private universities, with prospective students considered as consumers who ought to be protected from unfair or discriminatory practices.

Slap said that a vote on the bill in the Higher Education and Employment Advancement Committee will likely take place on either Tuesday or Thursday of next week; if passed, the bill will progress to the Senate floor of the larger legislature.

The bill, if enacted, would go into effect on July 1.

The post Yale opposes state bill to ban legacy preference appeared first on Yale Daily News.

The term bill includes tuition costs, which will rise to $67,250, and room and board for students who live on campus, which will rise to $19,900. The 2023-24 tuition was $64,700, and the room and board was $19,180. 

Despite the increase, University administration confirmed its commitment to financial aid and affordable tuition for students.

“People have difficulty understanding the relationship between the sticker price and the actual cost to them of an education at Yale,” University President Peter Salovey said. “We have to do a better job communicating that difference.”

Tuition costs have risen “mostly due to inflation,” Dean of Yale College Pericles Lewis told the News. Twenty years ago, tuition was $29,820, and in 2014, tuition was set at $44,000. Ten years later, tuition now stands nearly $25,000 higher.

But, Lewis said, the costs of higher education rise at higher rates than the national inflation rate. Indeed, tuition has doubled in the last decade even though $100 in 2014 would be worth only about $127 in 2024.

Lewis said that tuition costs cover roughly one-fourth of Yale College’s total costs, with the endowment covering half and research grants and other funding covering the last quarter. 

The total budget to run the University is about $5 billion, Lewis said, citing the 2022 Yale budget report, but “the ratios haven’t changed all that much” as tuition has grown.

Lewis said that the largest expense for Yale College is salary and benefits, from both faculty and staff salary, which make up about half of the budget. 

In April 2022, Salovey’s For Humanity capital campaign — the University’s fourth and most ambitious fundraising effort — announced a $1.2 billion fundraising goal as part of the $7 billion campaign. In October, Eugénie Gentry, associate vice president for development and campaign director, referred to this announcement as the beginning of a larger marketing effort called “Be the Key,” which has yet to publicly launch.

By the April announcement, the figure raised for this effort was greater than $603 million and included gifts that have allowed Yale to offer universally free tuition at the David Geffen School of Drama and need-based, full-tuition scholarships to students at the Divinity School.

“Yes, it’s true that for a family where they don’t qualify for any financial aid from Yale, they are going to pay more to be here and those tend to be families in the top couple of percent of the income distribution,” Salovey said. “For any other family, when tuition goes up, they should feel that that increase will be taken care of by increased financial aid and more.”

Among the challenges of leading an institution like Yale is the public’s distrust of higher education because of the belief that it is not affordable, Salovey told the News in September. 

He added that, at present, Yale is “more affordable than ever” because of its generous financial aid programs. However, Salovey said that this is a “very hard” message to communicate to the general public because “many colleges and universities can’t provide those funds,” which Ivy League universities and other member institutions of the Association of American Universities can provide. 

Politics, Salovey also said, complicates this message even more, making it more challenging to “champion what’s great about universities.”

“All of that exists in a very polarized political climate that makes it difficult for a university in so many ways,” Salovey said in September. “What we really need is a pride in our university college and university system which I think is second to none in the world and, unfortunately, for various political reasons, universities are [often] attacked [which] has made it harder to run a university.” 

Despite an increased sticker price, the University emphasized that Yale College’s need-based financial aid will not be affected. 

“If a family’s financial circumstances stay the same, their net cost will stay the same,” Kari DiFonzo, director of undergraduate financial aid, told Yale News last month.

Yale’s undergraduate financial aid budget has more than tripled since the 2007-08 academic year, according to Jeremiah Quinlan, dean of undergraduate admissions and financial aid. For the 2023-24 academic year, the financial aid budget was $241 million.

According to Quinlan, Yale is one of only eight American colleges that does not consider a student’s financial need when evaluating them for admission and meets every student’s demonstrated financial need without loans.

Yale’s need-blind status was challenged in a recent lawsuit alleging that the University — along with 16 peer institutions — was part of a price-fixing cartel. The University settled earlier this year but denied any allegations of wrongdoing.

The admissions office’s top priority in its outreach work is raising awareness about Yale’s affordability and need-based financial aid, according to Mark Dunn, senior associate director for outreach and recruitment at the Office of Undergraduate Admissions.

Dunn pointed to Yale’s college cost estimation tool, MyinTuition Quick Cost Estimator, which he said has been useful in helping families understand the difference between Yale’s sticker price and the price they will actually pay. More than 50,000 net price estimates were generated using the tool last year, according to Dunn.

Additionally, since 2013, the admissions office has run a postcard campaign for prospective students from low- and middle-class neighborhoods. The campaign advertises the extent of Yale’s need-based financial aid policies. Dunn told the News that he believes the campaign is largely responsible for the increase in applications from lower-income students over the past decade.

“Sharing Yale’s commitment to affordability is the top communications priority for the admissions office in all of our outreach work,” Dunn wrote.

The University’s endowment was $40.7 billion in 2023.

The post Tuition hikes continue to outpace inflation, admin say financial aid rising concurrently appeared first on Yale Daily News.

Under the new “test-flexible” policy, applicants must submit at least one score type out of a set of four: SAT, ACT, Advanced Placement, or AP, and International Baccalaureate, or IB. 

Yale first enacted a test-optional model in 2020, responding to impacts on standardized testing opportunities wrought by the COVID-19 pandemic. For each of the four application cycles that have followed, Yale has renewed its test-optional policy by one year at a time. This change will make next year’s Yale applicants, the prospective class of 2029, the first required to submit test scores in five years.

In an interview with the News, the admissions office explained its goals for the policy and hopes for the future.

“We hope that this becomes a more widespread, better understood policy,” Dean of Undergraduate Admissions and Financial Aid Jeremiah Quinlan said in an interview with the News on Thursday morning, after the College made its new policy public. “Because we knew that it was new, we felt pretty responsible for putting out the substance of the materials that we did. We also understand that this is the start of the conversation. We’re going to have to keep talking more about it, updating materials and spreading information as we move forward.”

Quinlan said that Yale decided to include AP and IB scores in the set of test types that fulfill Yale’s requirement because internal research suggested that they are similarly successful as SAT and ACT scores in predicting college academic success. 

By including AP and IB scores, Quinlan hopes that students for whom testing was not originally part of their college application plans — like students applying to schools who are otherwise test-optional or test-blind, such as the University of California system — will be able to also apply to Yale without having to devote extra hours to SAT and ACT preparation.

Applicants to the class of 2029 will see a new three-part section, according to the admissions office. The first section will allow students to select up to four score types they would like considered with their Yale application. The second will give students a space to report scores that do not appear elsewhere in their applications. The third, which will be optional, will allow students to explain the circumstances surrounding any of their included test scores.

If an applicant indicates that they want their AP scores considered with their application, they are expected to submit the scores for all AP exams they took. There is no maximum number of AP scores that can be submitted, according to Mark Dunn ’07, senior associate director for outreach and recruitment at the admissions office. 

However, Dunn cautioned against students viewing a good AP score as a “ticket” into Yale, especially if the score is for a subject that does not showcase an applicant’s unique abilities.

“We really want to break out of the paradigm of students thinking that if they can just get a good AP score they’ll be set,” Dunn said. “As an example, we’ve used the case of, if you’re a native Italian speaker who is at a school that doesn’t offer APs, and you decide to just take the AP Italian exam and get a 5 and use that as the score you submit to us. Yes, you’ve met our requirements. But you haven’t helped your case, because you haven’t added any new evidence to your application.”

Because of how Yale is asking what scores applicants would like considered, it is possible for an application to make its way to the admissions office without any scores. 

In this case, Dunn said, the application would be considered incomplete. The admissions office plans to handle incomplete applications of this nature by following up directly with applicants and allowing them to update their applications to include scores after submission.

International access, financial barriers

In an interview with the News, Quinlan said that the admissions office acknowledges the barriers that exist for international students trying to take SAT and ACT exams but maintained the importance of test scores in Yale’s admissions process.

Earlier this month, a News survey found that current students who qualify for financial aid were more likely to have applied to Yale without submitting test scores than their wealthier peers. This trend also holds for international students. Several international students previously told the News that for them, lack of access to the required tests — at the time, the SAT and the ACT — was a bigger concern than deciding whether their scores were good enough to submit. 

Quinlan hopes new efforts to make the SAT more accessible will alleviate some of these concerns.

Students taking the SAT outside the U.S. first had the opportunity to take the exam online in the spring of 2023. Beginning this year, the online SAT will be administered to domestic students as well.

“I think there is a lot of hope that the digital SAT is going to make the international administration easier, less burdensome, more secure, and will hopefully change the ability and access people have to the exam,” Quinlan told the News.

Pranava Dhar ’25, who was head counselor of Camp Yale’s Orientation for International Students, generally favors the change since such tests are internationally standardized — he said exams like AP tests, IB tests, the SAT and the ACT can function as “universal litmus test[s]” that allow Yale to compare applicants across many academic systems.

But Dhar also is concerned that including AP and IB exams may exacerbate existing access divides.

“Students who go to international schools (which generally correlates with some privilege) can fulfill the requirement simply with their IB or AP scores, which is part of the curriculum, [but] these tests are exorbitantly expensive for anyone outside those systems.” Dhar wrote to the News on Thursday after Yale’s announcement. “This may put pressure on students outside those systems to sign up for these tests due to an ‘unwritten expectation’ even when SAT/ACT would suffice.”

Dhar’s comments are his own and do not reflect those of OIS broadly.

Discussions of international access did not play a large role in the decision to include AP and IB in the list of accepted tests, Quinlan said.

In interviews with the News earlier this month, many of the students who omitted scores from their Yale applications said that a main reason for doing so was that their scores were below the median range published on the admissions website.

Students said that seeing that their score was below Yale’s median likely would have deterred them from applying in a test-required admissions cycle.

The admissions office said they are aware of this and emphasized again that a relatively low score that stands out in relation to an applicant’s high school context can be extraordinarily helpful.

Dunn told the News that the office is in the process of expanding the median scores published on the admissions website from the currently-listed 25th to 75th percentile to instead show the 10th to 90th percentiles. He added, however, that this does not necessarily mean that applicants under the 10th percentile mark will not be competitive. 

“We’re encouraged by the fact that we have had lots of experience admitting and enrolling very talented students from lower-income backgrounds in years when we are requiring test scores,” Dunn said. “We did not have big challenges in our selection process responding to students with scores that were below our median.”

Quinlan hopes that other institutions will follow Yale’s lead and adopt a similar test-flexible approach in the near future.

“We understand that this is a new flavor of standardized testing,” Quinlan said. “But I hope that it’s one that other institutions will consider really seriously. Because it does continue to allow for some students for whom ACT or SAT testing is not part of their college plans to continue to provide the admissions committee with really valuable information that can help us respond to their talent and admit them to Yale.”

At present, more than 80 percent of U.S. colleges and universities remain test-optional, according to a recent tally from FairTest, an organization that describes its goal to be “promoting fair, open, valid and educationally beneficial evaluations of students, teachers and schools,” according to its website.

Anika Arora Seth contributed reporting.

The post ‘New flavor of standardized testing’: admissions office shares details on Yale’s new ‘test-flexible’ policy appeared first on Yale Daily News.

“Our experience with both test-optional and test-required policies has persuaded us of three things,” the University wrote in a statement posted on the admissions office website. “First, when used thoughtfully as part of a whole-person review process, tests can help increase rather than decrease diversity in our class. Second, a narrow focus on only the ACT and SAT can discourage promising students from considering colleges like Yale. Finally, inviting students to apply without any test scores can, inadvertently, disadvantage students from low-income, first-generation, and rural backgrounds.”

The University is the second Ivy League school to announce its long-term testing policy, after Dartmouth decided to resume a test-required policy earlier this month. Unlike Yale, however, Dartmouth will not accept AP and IB scores to fulfill the testing requirement.

In the statement, the admissions office said that the four years of test-optional applications afforded it the ability to re-evaluate the role that test scores play in its deliberation process. New research by organizations like Opportunity Insights about the predictive ability of standardized test scores helped inform the admissions office’s decision, the website says.

Among Opportunity Insights’ findings are that students with higher SAT and ACT scores are more likely to have higher college GPAs than their lower-scoring counterparts, and that high school GPAs alone are poor predictors of college success.

The office maintained that, despite accepting more types of scores, it does not prefer one score type over another, and students who submit more scores will not be advantaged.

Yale urged applicants against taking more tests to increase the number of scores that they include in their application. A narrow focus on testing is “not a wise college preparation strategy,” according to the Thursday release.

Going forward, the Yale-specific questions on all accepted application forums — the Common Application, the Coalition Application and the QuestBridge application — will contain a space for students to report scores that they would like considered with their Yale applications.

In a different optional question, students will have space to explain any of the circumstances surrounding their testing experience.

The role of tests in admissions

Under Yale’s holistic review framework, standardized test scores can help contextualize other parts of an application, like high school GPA, according to the admissions office.

“No exam can demonstrate every student’s college readiness or perfectly predict future performance,” Thursday’s statement reads. “Tests can highlight an applicant’s areas of academic strength, reinforce high school grades, fill in gaps in a transcript stemming from extenuating circumstances, and—most importantly—identify students whose performance stands out in their high school context.”

When admissions officers evaluate applications that do not include test scores — as they have often had to do in the past four test-optional cycles — they are forced to put more weight on other parts of the application. But, according to the release, this process frequently disadvantaged less wealthy applicants. 

In a survey conducted earlier this month, the News found that students who receive financial aid were less likely to have submitted scores with their Yale applications than their wealthier counterparts.

Since going test-optional, Yale has seen a disproportionate increase in applications from students who would be the first in their family to attend college and students from neighborhoods with below-median household incomes. Applications to the class of 2028 saw applications from first-generation students and low-income students increase 13 percent and 19 percent more than the overall applicant pool, respectively.

In conversations with the News, low-income students who omitted scores said that they did so out of worry that a score below Yale’s median would take away from other parts of their application, or immediately disqualify them from consideration.

But Bruce Sacerdote, a researcher at Opportunity Insights, previously told the News that lower-income students submit test scores “at too low a rate,” according to his research. 

“We hypothesize that this stems from applicants not having full knowledge of how test scores are used in context,” Sacerdote wrote to the News. “Scores are used as only one input and are viewed in the context of the applicant’s background, neighborhood and high school. As a result, applicants may not realize that their score is an impressive one that could help their admission chances.”

The new comments from the admissions office are in line with Sacerdote’s research, affirming that a score below Yale’s median can actually be useful in identifying applicants who stand out within their high school or personal environment.

Students from well-resourced high schools often have access to easy “substitutes” for standardized test scores, such as many advanced courses, comments from teachers with whom they have close relationships and hoards of impressive enrichment activities, per the statement.

Students from lower-resourced high schools, on the other hand, may have less access to advanced courses that showcase their academic ability, and more generic comments from teachers who deal with larger class sizes, the release says.

“With no test scores to supplement these components, applications from students attending [lower-resourced] schools may leave admissions officers with scant evidence of their readiness for Yale,” the release says. “When students attending these high schools include a score with their application – even a score below Yale’s median range — they give the committee greater confidence that they are likely to achieve academic success in college.”

Access barriers and goals moving forward

In addition to increased applications from first-generation and low-income students, since going test-optional in 2020, applications from international students increased by 130 percent, twice the rate of growth of domestic applicants, according to data from the admissions office.

Numerous international students spoke with the News about the barriers to access they faced when trying to take the SAT and ACT in their home countries. Many students said they had to travel long distances, often to other countries, to take the tests, a process that students felt favored wealthier applicants.

In a recent episode of the podcast “Inside the Yale Admissions Office” titled “How We Got Here,” hosts Mark Dunn ’07, senior associate director for outreach and recruitment at the Office of Undergraduate Admissions, and Hannah Mendlowitz ’12, associate director of admissions, said that it is “pretty easy” to understand why international applications increased when Yale adopted a test-optional policy.

“Registering for and taking the SAT or ACT abroad is much more challenging than it is in the US,” Mendlowitz said in the episode. “And understandably, many international students haven’t invested the same amount of time in preparing for or learning about those tests. So removing that barrier meant that a lot more international students could apply. And they did.”

As the admissions landscape has changed in the four years since most colleges went test-optional, Quinlan said he hopes adding AP and IB to the list of accepted scores will not disadvantage students who “have not had the ACT or SAT as part of their planning for college.”

Looking toward the future, Quinlan said that, while he is confident in the new test-flexible model, it is not set in stone.

“We are in a dynamic moment for standardized testing,” Quinlan told Yale News. “There are efforts to design and roll out new tests, and there is more energy for developing alternatives to the SAT or ACT than ever before. Although our research on the predictive power of the four tests we will accept next cycle is compelling, I like that our policy is flexible by design and can easily accommodate future additions to the list of required scores.”

Yale first announced a test-optional policy in June 2020.

The post Yale reinstates standardized testing requirement, allows AP and IB scores appeared first on Yale Daily News.

Since going test-optional in 2020, Yale has seen a disproportionate increase in applications from international students. In the past three application cycles — excluding the current year — applications from international students increased at three times the rate of increase of domestic applicants.

In a survey conducted earlier this month about the experiences of students taking standardized tests, the News received 110 responses from international students. For domestic respondents, 95 percent who took the survey reported that they took a standardized test before college, as opposed to 83 percent of international respondents.

Several international students told the News that for them, inability to access the tests was a bigger concern than deciding whether to submit their scores. Students said that access to ACT and SAT test centers was sparse and tended to favor wealthier students. 

“I am a low-income student, so that meant that I struggled with the access part,” said Jesse Okoche ’25, who is from Botswana. “I want [the admissions office] to be considerate of the fact that not everybody has access to [the tests].”

Tajrian Khan ’27, who receives almost full financial aid to attend Yale, said that he is the only student from Bangladesh in his year and the first person from his school to ever attend the University. Khan described a litany of obstacles to taking the SAT in Bangladesh.

He explained that he remembers only seven test centers operating in all of Bangladesh when he was applying. He said that the centers were located in private schools in the two largest cities, making students from other areas of the country to bear travel costs. He recalled that the SAT cost the equivalent of 109 dollars to take, which he said his family could afford because both his parents worked. But Khan pointed out that the average monthly income in Bangladesh –– which was the equivalent of around $295 in 2022 –– makes the price difficult for most families.

Khan said that he thinks standardized tests should not be optional because they provide an important metric to evaluate international applicants. However, he stressed that changes should be made to make the tests accessible to lower-income international students.

“If you’re low income in the U.S., you get to take the test for free,” Khan said of free testing days offered in many U.S. high schools. “That should be the same for internationals, because so many people just can’t take the test. It’s a huge burden.”

The survey also found that international respondents who receive no financial aid from Yale — wealthier international students — were more likely to have taken a test than those who receive aid, the gap being especially pronounced for those receiving a large amount of aid. Of international respondents who do not qualify for financial aid, 89 percent took the test, in contrast to 75 percent of respondents receiving full or almost full aid.

Per data available in Yale’s Common Data Set, and confirmed by Director of Undergraduate Financial Aid Kari DiFonzo, 64 percent of international students at Yale College overall receive some amount of financial aid.

“The admissions office is, of course, familiar with the challenges associated with accessing test administration sites outside of the U.S.,” Dean of Undergraduate Admissions and Financial Aid Jeremiah Quinlan wrote in an email to the News. “It is not surprising that removing a testing requirement would be associated with a large increase in applications from international students.”

Earlier this month, Dartmouth College announced that it will resume its standardized test requirement for applicants in the next admissions cycle. 

Okoche said that when he was first applying to college, there was only one SAT or ACT test center in all of Botswana. He said the center was five hours away from his home and extremely difficult to access.

Because his grades and extracurricular activities were strong and the journey to take the test was long and pricey, Okoche said he decided not to take an ACT or SAT and applied without test scores to all U.S. colleges. 

He was not accepted to any U.S. private four year colleges straight out of high school and ended up spending two years at a Massachusetts community college before transferring to Yale last fall. Okoche said that he also did not include test scores when applying to Yale as a transfer student.

AJ Nakash ’26 traveled to Florida, where he had family, on two separate occasions to take the test after numerous SATs were canceled in his home country of Jamaica.

Tian Hsu ’26, who went to a private high school in London, said that the inaccessibility of test centers outside of the U.S. is a process that tends to favor wealthier international students who come from private schools and have the resources to take the exams no matter the cost of travel, preparation or missing school.

She recalled counselors at her high school telling students that, even though U.S. colleges were test-optional, omitting scores from their applications would put them at a disadvantage, because the schools “knew they had the resources” to take the tests and do well. 

By “resources,” Hsu said, they were referring to the fact that she and her peers had the financial means to travel as far as necessary to access a test center.

“I think the most distinctive thing about the international experience taking the ACT, and maybe the SAT as well, is the fact that it’s definitely not going to be easy to take, but you’re expected to take it anyway,” Hsu told the News.

Overall, Hsu said that it tends to be international students with the resources to travel long distances who have the ability to access test centers. 

“For Yale to reinstate their testing requirement, it’s like saying to that one international student who couldn’t take it that there is no place for them here,” Okoche said. “Just because they don’t have access to that one required thing, not because they aren’t good enough.” 

Yale instituted need-blind admissions for international students in 2000.

The post International students describe unequal access to standardized test centers appeared first on Yale Daily News.

Even before she sat for her SAT, Gazard said she knew that she would not be submitting those scores with her applications to Ivy League or other selective schools.

Still, when it came time to apply to college, Gazard worried about the possible implications of omitting scores from her application. 

She asked for advice from her school counselor, who said, “[it’s] up to you.” She looked at the average test scores listed on the Yale admissions website, which cite a score of 1450 as being in the 25th percentile. She attended talks with admissions officers in her county, who assured her that withholding a score would not be held against her.

Ultimately, she decided not to submit her test score — which was well below Yale’s average — to any Ivy League school.

The deciding factor, Gazard said, was that she did not want schools to “write her off” just because she had a low score. Instead, she hoped that omitting a score would allow the other, stronger parts of her application to shine.

“I’m a top student, I’ve done some interesting extracurriculars, I am really strong in my supplemental writing and my interview went really great,” Gazard said. “I felt like if I put the test score down, it would have probably been to my detriment, and taken away from all that.”

As the debate over the merits of requiring standardized test scores in applications at universities across the country has swelled, the News found in a survey of nearly 1,000 undergraduates that Yale College students receiving financial aid are less likely to have included an ACT or SAT score in their Yale applications than students not on aid. 

But this finding comes at a time when new research from policy institute Opportunity Insights suggests that test scores may be better predictors of college success than high school grades, which could help colleges facilitate upward mobility. Previous research from the institute found that requiring test scores may act to enhance the diversity of admits, rather than restrict it.

The News received 978 responses to a survey sent to all students in the College, marking a 15-percent response rate overall. Of those who took the SAT, the ACT or both since Yale adopted a test-optional policy in 2020, 86.7 percent submitted a score with their application. 

The survey revealed that 95 percent of respondents receiving no financial aid who took a test submitted a score, compared to only 75 percent of respondents receiving full or almost full aid. 

Bruce Sacerdote, one of the researchers at Opportunity Insights, told the News that the survey results are consistent with his findings, which both indicate that disadvantaged students submit their tests “at too low a rate” given their scores.

“We hypothesize that this stems from applicants not having full knowledge of how test scores are used in context,” Sacerdote wrote to the News. “Scores are used as only one input and are viewed in the context of the applicant’s background, neighborhood and high school. As a result, applicants may not realize that their score is an impressive one that could help their admission chances.”

Earlier this month, Dartmouth College announced that it will resume its standardized test requirement for applicants in the next admissions cycle. Several other selective colleges such as Georgetown University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology have also reinstated requirements, which — like Yale’s — were originally suspended during the pandemic.

Yale plans to announce its long-term testing policy at the end of the month, according to Dean of Undergraduate Admissions and Financial Aid Jeremiah Quinlan. 

Stuart Schmill, dean of admissions at MIT, where the testing requirement has been reinstated, told the New York Times that when low-income students and students of color submit their scores, those numbers are considered in the context of their economic situation and are useful to flag promising applicants whose potential might otherwise go overlooked.

The News survey found that students on no financial aid who took a test were 19.6 percentage points more likely to have submitted those results than students on full or almost full financial aid, and 14.8 percentage points more likely to submit than students on any level of financial aid.

Out of the 978 students who responded to the survey, 529 students, or 54.1 percent, are on some amount of financial aid. This figure is similar to Yale’s overall share of 53 percent, according to Mark Dunn, senior associate director for outreach and recruitment at the Office of Undergraduate Admissions.

The News’ results coincide with a trend in increased application rates from first-generation and low-income students in the years since Yale went test-optional. Between this year’s application cycle and last year’s, applications from first-generation college students increased 13 percent more than the overall uptick in applicants, and applications from students from neighborhoods with below-median household incomes increased 19 percent more than the overall pool, according to data shared with the News by the Office of Undergraduate Admissions.

According to Yale’s submission to the Common Data Set from the 2022-2023 academic year, an annual report of statistics and information about various colleges, 88 percent of all students who matriculated last year submitted a test score with their applications to Yale.

This 88 percent figure refers to the total number of students who had a test score in their application materials; however, when applying to Yale, students had the option to opt out of their test scores being considered by Yale specifically. There is no figure available on the total number of students whose test scores were considered with their Yale applications, but Dunn said that the figure is lower than 88 percent. In other words, less than 88 percent of all students who matriculated last year had test scores considered with their Yale applications. Yale has not released any further details about admissions patterns

Quinlan wrote to the News that the admissions office is not reporting data on test scores, the choice of applicants to share test scores or the share of admitted students who submitted test scores.

The News spoke to 21 students about their experiences with taking standardized tests. 15 students submitted test scores when applying to Yale and six did not.

The choice to submit

Several students told the News that they decided to submit their test scores in order to distinguish themselves from other students from their high schools and areas that admissions officers would be comparing them to.

Annalie Diaz ’27 — who was admitted to Yale through the QuestBridge match program — chose to submit her score. She said that she decided to submit her score, which was below Yale’s average, because she knew it stood out in comparison to scores from other students at her high school.

Diaz described her high school as “extremely” under-resourced. She said the average SAT score ranges from around a 900 to a 1000. Since colleges went optional, Diaz said most students stopped taking the SAT altogether.

Even a score in Yale’s 25th percentile, when considered in the broader context of her high school environment, would show her commitment and capability, Diaz recalled thinking.

Freddie Rivas-Giorgi ’26 was also compelled to submit a test score in hopes of standing out. In his case, however, he hoped to stand out in comparison to students from wealthy urban areas.

Coming from a rural high school, Rivas-Giorgi said he didn’t have access to the same impressive extracurriculars as his peers in larger, more affluent cities. As an example, he recalled not being able to conduct research at a university because of geographic barriers. 

“[Submitting a score] really helped in my case, simply because it provided an objective measurement of my own skills and preparation,” Rivas-Giorgi told the News. “That certainly could overcompensate for a relative weakness in extracurriculars compared to students coming from larger cities. I think scores certainly can level the playing field, at least in my situation it did.”

Owen Haywood ’26 came from a public school where students are rarely admitted to Ivy League schools. 

Early on, Haywood wanted to “aim low” and be realistic in his college plan, but when he got his score, he realized he was a competitive student for a school like Yale. 

“Getting the score was something that I felt not only helped my application in the end but also gave me the confidence to even send in that application in the first place,” Haywood said.

Several other students on financial aid who took a test told the News that they opted not to submit a score because they felt that their score did not represent them and that a low score would take away from other, stronger parts of their applications.

David Rutitsky ’27, who receives financial aid from Yale, said that he was too busy with other commitments in high school to devote enough time to study for and score well on the SAT. 

With many AP classes and two jobs, he had too much on his plate to add test prep to the mix, he said.

“I really think SAT scores are more of a reflection of just how good of a school you’re in and even your income,” Rutitsky said. “Because some people don’t have to work two jobs.”

Impending University decision 

With the University slated to announce its long-term testing policy in the coming weeks, students were relatively split on their opinions on the role of standardized testing in college admissions.

Some students said that they are opposed to a test-required policy, saying that tests are not accurate predictors of success and that they disadvantage students who face difficulties accessing them. Others were open to the University requiring tests so long as scores are considered in the context of an applicant’s overall academic background.

“I think, when considering standardized test scores, what colleges have to do is look at the score as just a part of who the student is and within the broader context of that student’s demographic and personal background,” Haywood said. “A student who’s coming from a Title I funded public school who gets a 34 on the ACT is very different from a student coming from a private boarding school who gets a 34 on the ACT.”

Diaz said that, as a low-income student, she believes she greatly benefited from submitting her test score. 

Even though it was below Yale’s median, her score was 400 points above her high school average, something that she believed showed her ability to excel within her environment. 

“But, if they switch back to test-required, Yale needs to make themselves seem more welcoming to low-income students,” Diaz told the News. “They need to be transparent about how they’re considering scores. And they need to work alongside organizations like QuestBridge, which taught me that, regardless of test scores, Yale welcomes people like me.”

On the other hand, Rutitsky said that tests pose a barrier to entry that may not accurately measure applicants’ capability.

If Yale reinstates a test requirement, he said that he fears Yale may be depriving itself of highly capable students who simply do not have the time or resources to test well.

“I want to stress the fact that I’m doing well in college, even though my test scores were low,” he said. “A big reason why I don’t think tests should exist anymore is because the whole idea of the tests in the first place is to judge how well you would be able to get college work done. And in my case, the test is not a reflection of that.”

But Evan Burkeen ’27 said he believed submitting his test score was crucial to demonstrating his academic ability and validating the upward trend of his high school grades.

He said he believes that because test scores are a quantitative measure of achievement, they become a scapegoat for disparities in the admissions process, even though there are disparities in extracurriculars, essays and other qualitative parts of the application.

“This is the wrong thing to attack if we need to make sure that admissions is a more equitable process,” Burkeen said.

The first SAT was offered in 1926.

Update, Feb. 15: The article was updated to clarify the context of the data included in Yale’s Common Data Set.

The post Financial aid recipients less likely to have applied to Yale with test scores appeared first on Yale Daily News.

A total of 57,512 students sought admission to the class of 2028, marking a 10-percent increase in applications from last year. Within the pool, trends showed increased applications from first-generation and low-income students, in line with the admissions office’s goals of increasing outreach to those demographics. The pool will be the first to be evaluated since the fall of affirmative action last summer. If admitted, applicants will join the 709 students offered early admission to the class of 2028 in December.

“It is heartening to see that high-achieving students from all across the country and around the world are identifying Yale as a good fit in their college search process,” Jeremiah Quinlan, dean of undergraduate admissions and financial aid, wrote in an email to the News. “Attracting an excellent and diverse applicant pool is the first step in building a class filled with students whose strengths make Yale a better place to learn.”

Within the record-large applicant pool, applications from students from first-generation college students and students from neighborhoods with below-median household incomes increased disproportionately. The former increased 13 percent more than the overall pool and the latter increased 19 percent more.

Zooming out further, over the past decade, applications from first-generation students have increased at 1.5 times the rate of the overall applicant pool, and applications from students in lower-income neighborhoods increased by twice the overall rate in the past decade. 

Mark Dunn ’07, senior associate director for outreach and recruitment at the Office of Undergraduate Admissions, said that students from these backgrounds have been a priority in the admissions office’s outreach efforts for many years.

Applicants who applied to enroll in the fall of 2020, or to join the class of 2024, were the last class to apply before the COVID-19 pandemic and before the start of Yale’s extended test optional policy. 

In the three application cycles since the pandemic —  those for students applying to join the classes of 2025, 2026 and 2027 — applications from international students grew at three times the rate of domestic students.

But this year, applications from both domestic and international students increased at the same rate, for the first time since the pandemic, according to Dunn. 

Dunn emphasized that a large applicant pool does not necessarily indicate successful outreach by the admissions office.

The strength of the pool is instead measured by the applicants’ academic strength and diversity of experiences, he said, which can only be revealed through the office’s whole-person review.

“I think the trends we’ve seen in our applicant pool and our incoming first-year class strongly suggest that our messaging about Yale’s extraordinary need-based financial aid is reaching more high-achieving students from lower-income backgrounds than ever before,” Dunn wrote in an email to the News. “I also believe students of all backgrounds are drawn to Yale’s diverse and supportive community, its rigorous but flexible liberal arts program, and its extraordinary academic resources.” 

The Supreme Court ruled to end affirmative action in higher education on June 29, 2023.

The post Yale receives largest-ever applicant pool appeared first on Yale Daily News.

The News spoke with students and faculty across the political spectrum to gauge their reactions to the news. The majority were not surprised by DeSantis’ decision to withdraw from the race, with many attributing his downfall to a lack of charisma and a refusal to differentiate himself from Trump. Students and faculty said the path is charted for a Trump versus Biden rematch in November.

“The premise of the DeSantis campaign was that he was a more palatable Trump, but that didn’t work,” Philip Gorski, a professor of sociology, said. “Something I heard that captures this pretty well is, like, ‘why would you go see a Rolling Stones cover band if the Rolling Stones are still out on tour? I think that there is a plurality in the Republican base that is more interested in performance than policy. They’re more devoted to a person than to an ideology at this point.”

Gorski, who studies the role of conservative religion in American politics, said that DeSantis predicated his campaign on the premise that Republicans wanted someone who could translate Trumpism into a clear policy agenda. But DeSantis was mistaken, Gorski argues; they wanted Trump himself.

Why DeSantis fell short

Students and faculty members gave the News different hypotheses for DeSantis’ lackluster performance. Some pointed to his unpopular political stances and others argued that he should have focused on his achievements as Governor of Florida instead. 

Most consistently, University members felt that DeSantis lacked the charisma of Trump and the marketability of Nikki Haley.

William Wang ’26 is a registered Democrat who told the News that his choice Republican candidate would be Haley. He expressed disappointment with the lack of overt GOP pushback to Trumpism and said that DeSantis is missing the “courage” to challenge someone popular within the party.

“Chris Christie was the most formidable critic of President Trump, but he dropped out,” said Wang. “But none of the other Republicans, it seems to me, dare to challenge this fringe candidate and say what he does is not what America can stand for. But Haley is ramping up her attack after New Hampshire — so we’ll see.”

Wang was referring to Wednesday’s primary in New Hampshire, in which Trump defeated Haley by taking 12 delegates to her 9.

Trevor McKay ’25, who described his political stance as that of a conservative who does not identify with “any modern political party,” also said that he was “disappointed” but not surprised at DeSantis’ exit from the race. 

While DeSantis’ initial appeal was that he offered Trump’s far-right policies without his “brusque personality,” McKay believes that DeSantis should not have run with Trump in the race

David Bromwich ’73 GRD ’77, a professor of English, agreed, saying that by casting himself as a Trump alternative, DeSantis failed to focus on his accomplishments as Florida governor.

“He started to lose early because he made a wrong decision to run to the right of Trump on culture-war issues, instead of running on his record as a successful governor with a demonstrated executive ability that Trump lacked,” Bromwich wrote. 

Both Gorski and Viktor Kagan ’24, a liberal democrat, also pointed to the Florida governor’s glaring unpopularity with young, Gen-Z voters.

Kagan said that he believes DeSantis alienated many young voters by focusing on the culture war and positioning himself far right on many social issues. Namely, Kagan referred to DeSantis’ positions on public schools and abortion access as “simply unpopular” among most Americans. 

On the campaign trail, DeSantis said that he would support a 15-week abortion ban, with exceptions for instances of rape, incest and the life-endangering situations for the mother. In 2022, DeSantis endorsed the Individual Freedom Act – which limited the way gender and race are spoken about in classrooms and workplaces. 

“Americans, including myself, really want new faces running and that’ll happen in 2028 — it’ll be important that they are younger, listen to and work for Gen Z as they do for other generations, and run on issues that invest in public resources, not outsource them,” Kagan said. “Hearing future candidates wanting to raise the retirement age, send public school funds to private schools, and obnoxious rhetoric about civil rights does not inspire any member of Gen Z to vote for them.”

Haley, Trump and Biden: the future of the 2024 presidential race 

With DeSantis officially out of the running for the Republican nomination, students and faculty also weighed in on Donald Trump and Nikki Haley, the two dominant candidates still on the ticket.

All of the individuals with whom the News spoke predicted that Trump would easily take the Republican nomination and that Haley would drop out of the race in the near future.

Daniel Romoser ’26, who described himself as a “Burkean conservative” does not see a hopeful future for Haley in the upcoming South Carolina primary, especially with her loss in New Hampshire given the support she received from the governor of New Hampshire. 

As a voter, Romoser would prefer to have as many options as possible, though he predicts an inevitable showdown between Trump and Biden.  

For Nikki Haley to prove herself as a formidable opponent, she must confront Trump’s media presence. 

“Trump does have this aura around him that’s hard for any other candidate to replicate,” Wang told the News. “I think Trump has internalized this idea that there’s no such thing as bad press. Any press is press, and his supporters see bad press and turn Trump into a martyr. I don’t think Haley can play Trump’s game better than him. I think to win, both her and the eventual Democratic nominee have to anchor to the better angels of our nature.” 

Gorski attributed Haley’s relative success thus far less to an embodiment of Trumpism than to her political savvy and well-managed campaign. She is the best “retail politician,” he said, and is someone who embodies the old Republican establishment.

The legacy of Ron DeSantis

Gorski describes DeSantis, by contrast, as a “very bad” retail politician. He added that he does not foresee a future in which DeSantis appears on another national ballot, or is a figure in national politics at all beyond his post as Florida governor.

“The perception of him, rightly or wrongly, is that he lacks charisma and people skills,” Gorski said. “I don’t know how true that is. But, I think anybody who burns through $150 million and doesn’t make it past Iowa is going to have a very hard time relaunching another national political campaign. I think he’ll suffer a similar fate as people like Scott Walker and Jeb Bush.”

Throughout his campaign for president, DeSantis said that his Yale education was marked by “unadulterated leftism.” Earlier this year, the News examined these claims in an investigative profile piece. 

In all, DeSantis’ drop-out has churned the Republican party toward an imminent Trump nomination, Gorski said.

“Trump’s hostile takeover of the Republican Party is basically complete at this point,” Gorski told the News. “These first two primaries really write the epitaph on the Reagan revolution version of the GOP. It really is stunning how much money was spent trying to stop Trump and how ineffective those efforts were. There will, of course, be a post Trump GOP some day, but I think it’s far too early to know what that will look like. The only thing that we really can know for certain at this point is that we’re in the post-Reagan GOP.”

The next presidential primary will happen in South Carolina on Feb. 24. 

The post What DeSantis missed: students and faculty reflect on Ron DeSantis’ exit from the presidential race appeared first on Yale Daily News.

The class action lawsuit was brought in January 2022 against Yale and 16 other elite schools, all of whom had at some point been members of the 568 Presidents Group, a consortium that collaborates to determine formulae used to calculate need-based financial aid packages for students. The plaintiffs accused the colleges of practicing need-aware admissions and colluding to reduce financial aid given to students.

On Tuesday night, Yale joined Brown, Columbia, Duke and Emory in paying a total of $104.5 million to settle their portion of the lawsuit.

Section 568 of the Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994, provided an exemption to standard antitrust law, allowing any university that makes admissions decisions “without regard to the financial circumstances of the student involved or the student’s family” — or one that practices need-blind admissions — to share formulas for assessing students’ financial need. Section 568 expired on Sept. 30, 2022. 

However, the lawsuit alleged that, by favoring the children of donors for admission, members of what the suit dubs the “568 Cartel” did consider financial need, and were thus illegally practicing need-aware admissions.

The University denies any allegations of wrongdoing.

“Yale College’s financial aid offers meet the full financial need of each student, with none of the aid in the form of repayable loans,” the University wrote in a statement shared with the News. “This settlement contains no admission that Yale did anything wrong but allows the university to avoid the cost and disruption of further litigation and to continue its work in making undergraduate education more affordable for more families.”

Like Yale, Brown also maintains that it did not commit any wrongdoing, according to a press release issued on Tuesday night. Rather, Brown chose to settle in order to “focus its resources on further growth in generous aid for students.”

The five universities that settled on Tuesday join the University of Chicago and Vanderbilt University, both of which settled in 2023, and Rice University.

“As families nationwide face the pressure of rising college costs and student debt levels, Yale is proud of its 60-year tradition of need-blind admissions and its commitment to making undergraduate education accessible to students from all socioeconomic backgrounds,” Yale’s statement reads. “Yale College’s financial aid offers meet the full financial need of each student, with none of the aid in the form of repayable loans.”

Yale has practiced need-blind admissions for 60 years.

The post Yale will pay $18.5 million to settle price-fixing lawsuit, denies allegations of wrongdoing appeared first on Yale Daily News.